Difference between revisions of "Comparing Different Computers with N Queens Program"
Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | ==Comparing Java to C== | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | This calls for a quick comparison of the Java to C implementation, compiled by a C++ compiler with O3 optimization. | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Java on <br />MacBook Pro<br />2014 | ||
+ | ! C on<br />MacBook Pro<br />2014 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | <source lang="text"> | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 3 | ||
+ | 2 | ||
+ | 14 | ||
+ | 10 | ||
+ | 34 | ||
+ | 7 | ||
+ | 64 | ||
+ | 13 | ||
+ | 311 | ||
+ | 31 | ||
+ | 101 | ||
+ | 37 | ||
+ | 102 | ||
+ | 118 | ||
+ | 633 | ||
+ | 356 | ||
+ | 12586 | ||
+ | </source> | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | <source lang="text"> | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 4 | ||
+ | 0 | ||
+ | 17 | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | 159 | ||
+ | 2 | ||
+ | 40 | ||
+ | 5 | ||
+ | 40 | ||
+ | 49 | ||
+ | 319 | ||
+ | 170 | ||
+ | 6320 | ||
+ | </source> | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <br /> |
Revision as of 12:03, 24 October 2014
--D. Thiebaut (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2014 (EDT)
This is an example of how one can generate a quick comparison of the processing power of different systems using a CPU-bound (not using disk or network) application. This app in this case is a java program that finds the solution to the N-Queens problem while counting the number of probes it makes to the 2-D board. The source code is available here.
Here are some results gathered in Oct. 2014 on several systems I have access to. NxN is the dimension of the board. The different systems are:
- Macbook Pro, 2009, 2.53 GHz, Intel Core 2 Duo, 8GB 1067MHz DDR3, 2 cores
- Macbook Pro, 2014, 2.8 GHz Core i7, 16GB 1600MHz DDR3, 4 cores
- MacPro, 2009, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5462, 4 cores
- MacPro, 2014, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v2 @ 3.50GHz, 6 cores
- Beowulf2, (year?) Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz, 1 core
All times in the table below are in milliseconds (ms).
NxN | Macbook Pro 2009 |
Macbook Pro 2014 |
MacPro 2009 |
MacPro 2014 |
Linux Mint Beowulf2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8x8
9x9
10x10
11x11
12x12
13x13
14x14
15x15
16x16
17x17
18x18
19x19
20x20
21x21
22x22
23x23
24x24
25x25
26x26
27x27
28x28
29x29
30x30
|
0
0
0
0
1
0
26
17
37
28
87
19
144
36
750
81
242
92
248
284
1551
1518
33667
|
1
0
1
0
1
0
3
2
14
10
34
7
64
13
311
31
101
37
102
118
633
356
12586
|
0
1
0
0
1
0
8
5
27
19
67
13
119
26
662
63
199
72
201
232
1250
687
23558
|
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
18
13
41
9
70
17
384
39
119
44
121
142
734
413
14158
|
0
0
0
0
1
1
17
14
46
31
104
22
152
50
610
101
226
111
227
257
1213
684
22889
|
Comparing Java to C
This calls for a quick comparison of the Java to C implementation, compiled by a C++ compiler with O3 optimization.
Java on MacBook Pro 2014 |
C on MacBook Pro 2014 |
---|---|
1
0
1
0
1
0
3
2
14
10
34
7
64
13
311
31
101
37
102
118
633
356
12586
|
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
17
1
159
2
40
5
40
49
319
170
6320
|