Difference between revisions of "CSC352 Notes on the Python GIL"

From dftwiki3
Jump to: navigation, search
(Multiprocessing)
(Threads)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
;Solutions around the GIL?
 
;Solutions around the GIL?
: Jython: uses Java threads
+
: Jython: uses Java threads, which can run concurrently
 
: IronPython: all threads run concurrently
 
: IronPython: all threads run concurrently
  
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
* Good presentation at  http://www.slideshare.net/pvergain/multiprocessing-with-python-presentation
 
* Good presentation at  http://www.slideshare.net/pvergain/multiprocessing-with-python-presentation
* Official description of feature at http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0371/ ([[Python_PEP0371.pdf|cached copy]])
+
* Official description of feature at http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0371/ ([[Media:Python_PEP0371.pdf|cached copy]]).  Good reading of how performance was measured.
 
* New in Python 2.6
 
* New in Python 2.6
 
* Will use multiple cores
 
* Will use multiple cores
 
* Allows access to shared variables in shared memory, through special mechanisms.
 
* Allows access to shared variables in shared memory, through special mechanisms.
 
* API similar to threading API
 
* API similar to threading API
 +
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
[[Category:CSC352]][[Category:Python]][[Category:Threads]][[Category:Multiprocessing]]

Latest revision as of 22:46, 10 February 2010

Threads

From http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html
The Python interpreter is not fully thread safe. In order to support multi-threaded Python programs, there’s a global lock, called the global interpreter lock or GIL, that must be held by the current thread before it can safely access Python objects. Without the lock, even the simplest operations could cause problems in a multi-threaded program: for example, when two threads simultaneously increment the reference count of the same object, the reference count could end up being incremented only once instead of twice.
Therefore, the rule exists that only the thread that has acquired the global interpreter lock may operate on Python objects or call Python/C API functions. In order to support multi-threaded Python programs, the interpreter regularly releases and reacquires the lock — by default, every 100 bytecode instructions (this can be changed with sys.setcheckinterval()). The lock is also released and reacquired around potentially blocking I/O operations like reading or writing a file, so that other threads can run while the thread that requests the I/O is waiting for the I/O operation to complete.
Moral of the story
Only one thread at a time with Python
Solutions around the GIL?
Jython: uses Java threads, which can run concurrently
IronPython: all threads run concurrently

Multiprocessing